REVIEW OF THE DECENTRALIZATION PROCESS AND IT'S IMPACT ON ENVIRONMENTAL AND NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN TANZANIA

bulletIntroduction
bulletAbbreviations
bulletLegislation
bulletPART I: Conceptual Framework and Rationale for Decentralization
bullet1.1 Conceptual Framework
bullet1.2 Background to the Environmental Problems Facing in Tanzania
bullet1.3 Major Environmental Problems in Tanzania
bulletPART II: Tanzania's Experience with Decentralization: a Chronology of Events
bullet2.1 Introduction
bullet2.2 Decentralization Process (1972-1982)
bullet2.3 Decentralization Process (1983-1998)
bullet2.4 Local Government Reforms and Environmental Management
bulletPART III: The Policy Reforms and Environmental Management in Tanzania
bullet3.1 Introduction
bullet3.2 National Forestry Policy
bullet3.3 National Environmental Policy
bullet3.5 National Land Policy
bulletPART IV: Environmental Legislation Management by Local Government Authorities in Tanzania
bullet4.1 Introduction
bullet4.2 An Overview of Local Government Authorities
bullet4.3 District Local Government Authorities
bullet4.4 Urban Local Government Authorities
bulletPART V: Factors Hindering Effective Management of the Environment by Local Governement Authorities
bullet5.1 Introduction
you are here5.2 Lack of Property Rights Over Natural Resources
bullet5.3 Weak Formulation and Implementation of Bylaws
bullet5.4 Poor Enforcement of Environmental Laws
bullet5.5 Weak Penalties and Incentives
bulletPART VI: Practical Implications to Decentralize Environmental Management Structures
bullet6.1 Existing Interfaces and Linkages between Local Government Structures
bullet6.2 Capacity of Local Governments In Environmental Management
bulletPART VII: Conclusions and Recommendations
bullet7.1 Conclusions
bullet7.2 Recommendations
bulletReferences

Printable versions of this document:
Single HTML document
Microsoft Word format
Adobe Acrobat format

Get Acrobat MS-Word Viewer

5.2 Lack of Property Rights Over Natural Resources

Most people in rural areas depend upon the natural resources for their livelihood, yet, they have no legal rights to them. Despite legislative recognition of customary land rights, state and other investors continue to ignore rural peoples' rights to their natural resources. We have witnessed over the years the abolition of customary land tenure without payment or compensation to the rural people. For instance, Land Development (Specified Areas) Regulations of 1986, [Government Notice No. 659 of 1986] and the Extinction of Customary Land Rights Order [GN. 88 of 1987] abolished all customary land rights in most of the Arusha region (Shauri: 1996). These lands vested to the district councils who were then allowed to distribute the land freely.

Without customary rights and benefit sharing mechanisms on natural resources use are proved to be effective in practice, local populations will continue to become indifferent to the environment because they have no incentive to contain degradation and conserve the environment and natural resources.