REVIEW OF THE DECENTRALIZATION PROCESS AND IT'S IMPACT ON ENVIRONMENTAL AND NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN TANZANIA

bulletIntroduction
bulletAbbreviations
bulletLegislation
bulletPART I: Conceptual Framework and Rationale for Decentralization
bullet1.1 Conceptual Framework
bullet1.2 Background to the Environmental Problems Facing in Tanzania
bullet1.3 Major Environmental Problems in Tanzania
bulletPART II: Tanzania's Experience with Decentralization: a Chronology of Events
bullet2.1 Introduction
bullet2.2 Decentralization Process (1972-1982)
bullet2.3 Decentralization Process (1983-1998)
bullet2.4 Local Government Reforms and Environmental Management
bulletPART III: The Policy Reforms and Environmental Management in Tanzania
bullet3.1 Introduction
bullet3.2 National Forestry Policy
you are here3.3 National Environmental Policy
bullet3.5 National Land Policy
bulletPART IV: Environmental Legislation Management by Local Government Authorities in Tanzania
bullet4.1 Introduction
bullet4.2 An Overview of Local Government Authorities
bullet4.3 District Local Government Authorities
bullet4.4 Urban Local Government Authorities
bulletPART V: Factors Hindering Effective Management of the Environment by Local Governement Authorities
bullet5.1 Introduction
bullet5.2 Lack of Property Rights Over Natural Resources
bullet5.3 Weak Formulation and Implementation of Bylaws
bullet5.4 Poor Enforcement of Environmental Laws
bullet5.5 Weak Penalties and Incentives
bulletPART VI: Practical Implications to Decentralize Environmental Management Structures
bullet6.1 Existing Interfaces and Linkages between Local Government Structures
bullet6.2 Capacity of Local Governments In Environmental Management
bulletPART VII: Conclusions and Recommendations
bullet7.1 Conclusions
bullet7.2 Recommendations
bulletReferences

Printable versions of this document:
Single HTML document
Microsoft Word format
Adobe Acrobat format

Get Acrobat MS-Word Viewer

3.3 National Environmental Policy

The National Environment Policy (NEP) recognises the indispensable role of local governments in achieving its policy objectives. This is because most local authorities are better placed to receive local concerns and implement ways to create sustainable conditions. Local governments also construct, operate and maintain economic, social and environmental infrastructure, and establish local environmental policies and regulations. The NEP recognizes that local governments are better able to educate, mobilize and respond to the local community, also, enhance and implement environmental objectives.

The cabinet constitutes the apex coordination and policy committee at the national level, where all ministries present major environmental concerns. Environmental management in Tanzania is under the Vice President's Office (VP) which implements the policy through relevant Ministries and specialized committees. However, the policy has concentrated most of the powers and functions into VP office through the Division of Environment. Mandates flow from the VP office to the local governments but this is not clearly expressed in the NEP. As stated earlier, "the VP's office is expected to assist Ministries, public bodies and private persons engaged in activities which are likely to have a significant impact on the environment. But the coordinating role of the VP's is not clearly evident at the local level." (LEAT, 1998).

The NEP advocates for the formation of environmental committees to coordinate natural resources management at the regional, district, ward and village levels. As indicated in paragraph 104 of the NEP, environmental committees "shall be responsible for coordination and advising on obstacles to the implementation of environmental policy and programmes, promoting environmental awareness; information generation, assembly and dissemination (sic) on the environment relating to district, ward or village."1

These provisions will await the enactment of the framework law on environment so as to give normative effect to the policy statements.


  1. Section 104 of the National Environmental Policy, 1997