REPACKAGING AUTHORITARIANISM

Freedom of Association and Expression and the Right to Organize Under the Proposed NGO Policy for Tanzania

bulletIntroduction
bulletAcknowledgements
bulletI. Introductory Note
bulletII. Historical Foundations of NGO Policy
bullet2.1 Colonial Rule and the Societies Ordinance
bullet2.2 The Post-Colonial Period I: Single-Party Rule
bullet2.3 Post-Colonial Period II: Reform and Reaction
bulletIII. The Final Draft NGO Policy: Continuity and Change
bulletIV. So What is New in the New Policy?
bullet4.1 The Definition of NGOs
bullet4.2 The Legal and Institutional Framework
bullet4.3 Registration and De-Registration of NGOs
bullet4.4 The Policy-Making Process
you are hereV. The Draft NGO Bill
bullet5.1 On the Registrar of NGOs
bullet5.2 On Access to Justice
bullet5.3 On the Management of NGOs
bullet5.4 A Prickly "Union Matter"?
bullet5.5 NGOs Not Welcome?
bulletVI. What is to be Done?

Printable versions of this document:
Single HTML document
Microsoft Word format
Adobe Acrobat format

Get Acrobat MS-Word Viewer

V. THE DRAFT NGO BILL

As a rule, one would expect the formulation of government policy documents to precede the drafting of the legislation intended to give them effect. After all, in recent practice, such documents have been used ostensibly to provide the "terms of reference" to the drafters of legislation. The NGO Policy process does not appear to have served this purpose, however. Rather, the drafting of the legislation intended to implement the policy was begun in 1998, well before the policy process was itself completed. It is tempting to explain this strange timing and evident haste as a government manoeuvre to neutralize the challenge to its authority over NGOs presented by the petition filed by the NGO, BAWATA, challenging the constitutionality of its de-registration under the Societies Ordinance. This stratagem has two advantages from the government's point of view: the proposed repeal of the Ordinance renders BAWATA's petition challenging its constitutionality rather academic, while its re-enactment under a new guise promises to restore a status quo favourable to government interests. The suspicion that this bill is part of a programme to repackage authoritarianism raised by this timing is amply confirmed by an examination of the bill's substantive provisions.